![prithviraj chauhan episode 129 prithviraj chauhan episode 129](https://secure-media1.hotstar.com/r1/thumbs/PCTV/11/1000110411/PCTV-1000110411-hcdl.jpg)
IN THIS CONNECTION I MAY ADD THAT OUR PENSIONERS’ FEDERATION HAD FILED A COURT CASE IN SUPREME COURT W.P(C)529/2000 V/S U.O.I &OTHERS FOR REMOVING ANOMALIES IN PENSION OF 5TH AND 6TH BIPARTITE RETIREES BUT LATER ON OUR PENSIONERS’ FEDERATION HAD TO WITHDRAW THIS COURT CASE ON AT THE ADVICE OF SUPREME COURT THAT THEY SHOULD FIRST FILE THE CASE IN THE HIGH COURT.THERE IS A REFERENCE OF THIS CASE ONTHE VERDICT OF OUR CASE BY SUPREME COURT ON WHICH HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT TO DELHI HIGH COURT.(W.P(C)184/2011 AT SUPREME COURT AND W.P(C)1875/2013AT DELHI HIGH COURT AFTER TRANSFERRING. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT SENIOR EXECUTIVE WERE DRAWING MUCH LESSER PENSION A LEGAL NOTICE WAS SERVED ON BANK/GOVERNMENT/RBI.THEREFORE IN FEBRUARY 1999,GOVERNMENT BROUGHT A CONCEPT OF 40% OF THE LAST DRAWN BASIC PAY OVER AND ABOVE RS8500/BASIC PAY WITH MINIMUM OF RS4250/ PER MONTH WHICH CEILING IS CONTINUED TILL TODAY.THE PENSION CEILING OF 40% BASIC PENSION W.E.F IS APPLICABLE TO ONLY THOSE RETIRED AFTER ,THERE IS NO LOGIC IN FIXING THIS CUT-OFF DATE IN PERCENTAGE.AS PER S.C JUDGEMENT OF (KASTURI V/S SBI)THE BENEFIT SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXTENDED TO ALL RETIRED PRIOR TO.
![prithviraj chauhan episode 129 prithviraj chauhan episode 129](https://secure-media1.hotstarext.com/r1/thumbs/PCTV/77/1000111077/PCTV-1000111077-hcdl.jpg)
(6TH BIPARTITE RETIREES EPISODE)K.R.SAINI
![prithviraj chauhan episode 129 prithviraj chauhan episode 129](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-N5BLIKP8Gz4/X-nwWLgzsqI/AAAAAAAAAs8/bpvSdkf8oKYYdiajjBWVpQGHO3CrKrh1gCLcBGAsYHQ/s397/C3TZR1g81UNaPs7vzNXHueW5ZM76DSHWEY7onmfLxcK2iPKJ7h1WV8PRzFfaUvJRCDTBDgDpjYXbmQcWMUdjs7Zx96xg9jKzE3mGGMFEtucftae7ifDDzpW.png)
HOWEVER ,GOVERNMENT HAS NOT GIVEN THE APPROVAL YET. MOREOVER, PENSION WAS REVISED FROM INSTEAD OF AT 50% MAXIMUM RS4250/ NOT RS7400/ PER MONTH WHICH WAS LEGIMATE PENSION.IN THIS CONNECTION I MAY ADD THE PRESENT CHAIRMAN HAS RECOMMENDED REVISED PENSION W.E.F NOT FROM VIDE LETTER DATED.
![prithviraj chauhan episode 129 prithviraj chauhan episode 129](https://secure-media1.hotstarext.com/r1/thumbs/PCTV/33/1000111233/PCTV-1000111233-hcdl.jpg)
IN THE NEXT WAGE REVISION WITH MERGER OF 1148 POINTS OF CPI WHICH WAS EFFECTIVE FROM ,THE PENSION CEILINGS WERE REVISED WITHOUT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE ACTUAL SALARY SCALES DRAWN BY OFFICERS.THE HIGHEST BASIC PAY OF TOP EXECUTIVE WAS AT RS14800/PER MONTH (IN 6TH BIPARTITE STARTED FROM )THE METHODOLOGY ADOPTED WAS MERGER OF THE 548 POINTS OF CPI TO THE BASIC PENSION OF RS2400/WHICH WAS HIGHLY UNSCIENTIFIC RESULTING IN EROSION OF PENSION PAYABLE TO OFFICERS.EVEN A JUNIOR MOST OFFICER WITH RS9200/–AS MAXIMUM BASIC PAY WAS DRAWING PENSION LESS THAN 50% OF BASIC PAY.THIS HAS RESULTED IN FURTHER REDUCTION IN PENSION FROM 50% TO 28.71%. P.S THIS LETTER DEALS WITH PENSION ISSUES OF 5TH ,6TH AND 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES AND TO SOME EXTENT 8TH BIPARTITE RETIREES. I UNDER STAND THAT M.O.F HAD NOT REPLIED THE LETTER CDO/PM/16/SPL/1187 DATED TO S.B.I.NOW THIS LETTER HAS BEEN MENTIONEDIN THE ORDER OF DATED BY DELHI HIGH COURT TO BE PLACED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED BY M.O.F AND THE COMMITTEE HAS TO GIVE DELIBERATIONS ON THESE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING INW.P(C)1875/2013.NEXT DATE OF HEARING IS K.R.SAINI IN THIS CONNECTION I MAY ADD THAT THIS LETTER HAD BEEN WRITTEN BY THE THEN CHAIRMAN TO M.O.F IN RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LETTER F NO-HR DATED. REVISION OF PENSION SCHEME-BANK’S PROPOSAL ON PENSION.Ī) THE FIXATION OF TWO MONETARY CEILINGSON MAXIMUM BE DONE AWAY WITH ONE CEILING ONNMAXIMUM PENSION FIXED AT 50% OF THE AVERAGE SUBSTANTIVE PAY DRAWN DURING LAST 12 MONTHS PENSIONABLE SERVICE.IN OTHER WORDS THERE WOULD BE ONE CEILING AS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT INW.P(C)305 1987(VERDICT DATED ).ī) THE REVISED BASIC PAY AND ALLOWANCES PAYABLE IN TERMS OF WAGE/SCALES REVISION EFFECTIVE FROM / AND NOT AS STATED INNCLAUSE 16 OF THE 7TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT SALARY REVISION BE CONSIDERED FOR THEPURPOSE OF COMPUTATION OF PENSION.Ĭ) THE REVISED CEILING ON MAXIMUM PENSION POST FOR AWARD STAFF/(SUPERVISING STAFF) RETIREES BE MADEVEFFECTIVE FROM ANDCONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS BE EXTENDED TONSUCH PENSIONERS INTERMS OF COURTCASE V.KASTURI V/S S.B.I(1983)8 SEC30 TO ALL PENSIONERS SURVIVING ON THAT DATE. I REITERATE THAT ABOVE NOTED LETTER CONTAINS 37 PAGES AND DEAL IN PENSION ,D.A ON PENSION,FAMILY PENSION AND COMNUTATION FORMULA IN S.B.I AND BANK’S RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS REGARD.BUT I HAVE WRITTEN ON PENSION MATTER ONLY To babu2609, ramachandrapp, me, hganaiyer46, T.r., murthy, jpdatta, slgupta68, rajkumarnegi, Sudhir, antony, Narinder, srinivasan, Atam, govinds65, satish.sukheja, sureshshobha40, Suresh, Harbhajan, Dhanabalan, Lakshmanan, Jayakrishnan, BrijmohanĭEAR SIRS, IN CONTINUATION OF MY NOTES NOS PART1,PART2,AND PART 3 DATED THE 6TH,7TH AND 8TH MAY,2016, TODAY, I AM WRITING PART 4.